Garnett v. Remedi Seniorcare of Va., LLC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner did not raise a cognizable federal claim by seeking to prove that the state court abused its sentencing discretion in disregarding his psychiatric reports
• holding that the petitioner did not raise a cognizable federal claim by seeking to prove that the state judge abused his sentencing discretion in disregarding his psychiatric reports
• holding that petitioner raised no cognizable federal claim by seeking to prove that state judge abused his sentencing discretion by disregarding psychiatric reports (citing Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736, 741 (1948
• a state court claim that sentence was excessively harsh not the equivalent of a habeas claim that the trial judge had chilled exercise of right to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).