Garnett v. Farmers Home Administration (In Re Garnett)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The two provisions are certainly not inconsistent, and I don’t feel that the arguable redundancy argues in favor of restricting a section [506(d)] which is unambiguous on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).