Garnett v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following the in camera review of statements on appeal, concluding that the summary of the statements disclosed by the Commonwealth was sufficient to defeat the defendant’s claim of prejudice
• affirming after in camera review on appeal of allegedly exculpatory statements of the victim that were withheld from - 12 - the defendant based on a determination that they were not material
• reviewing legal claims de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).