Garnett v. City of Bellevue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• negligent infliction of emotional distress for officers’ harsh and offensive language in responding to a call that plaintiffs were loitering
• negligent infliction of emotional distress for officers' harsh and offensive language in responding to a call that plaintiffs were loitering
• where officers allegedly mistreated women accused of soliciting lounge patrons, court found public duty doctrine inapplicable because the “infliction of emotional distress [in the case] was the result of direct contact with the plaintiff, not the performance of a general public duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).