Garner v. Larkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “accept jurisdiction” over trusts where it would put the court in “an ill-defined, ongoing role that could be used for forum shopping”
• “Inquiry into whether an actual controversy exists is ‘jurisdictional in its character, and presents an issue which the court itself [is] bound to raise.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Stabler v. Ramsay, 88 A.2d 546, 549 (Del. 1952))
• assessing a conditional resignation in the trust context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).