Garner v. GIRARD TRUST BANK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding forfeiture that pension plan committee determined with sole discretion was subject to judicial review to insure good faith and reasonable judgment
• observing that “[t]he law is clear with regard to profit-sharing ... plans. Even when the -employee does not contribute to the plan, when he renders service to an employer who has such a plan in effect, he has a contractual right to enforce the plan according to its terms”
• observing that “[t]he law is clear with regard to profit-sharing . . . plans. Even when the employee does not contribute to the plan, when he renders service to an employer who has such a plan in effect, he has a contractual right to enforce the plan according to its terms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).