Skip to main content
· 3/21/2007

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Nak Sealing Technologies Corp.

Citations

  • 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 177
  • 148 Cal. App. 4th 937
  • 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3825
  • 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3017
  • 62 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 673
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Implied contractual indemnity is a type of equitable indemnity predicated on the indemnitor’s breach of contract with the indemnitee.”
  • “Implied contractual indemnity is a type of equitable indemnity . . . , predicated on the indemnitor’s breach of contract with the indemnitee.” (internal citation 23 omitted)
  • “As our review of the cases demonstrates, a duty to indemnify has been implied from the obligation of the contracting parties to perform their promises, the reasoning being that a promise to perform includes an implied promise to perform properly.”
  • “The essential characteristics of an agency relationship are as follows: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantil-Sakauye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.