Garlington v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “plaintiff’s disinterest in prosecuting her own case . . . diverted judicial resources and attention from other pending litigation”
• finding that plaintiff’s pro se status was mitigated by her legal training
• dismissing, sua sponte, pro se plaintiff-attorney’s case for failing to timely serve the complaint
• a court may take judicial notice of court filings and public records 26 filed in other court proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).