Skip to main content
· 8/13/2010

Garland v. Roy

Citations

  • 615 F.3d 391
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16776
  • 2010 WL 3190703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Reyes- Requena test and holding that a Santos claim qualified under the § 2255(e) savings clause and could therefore be brought pursuant to § 2241

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Wiener, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.