Garland Grain Co. v. D-C Home Owners Improvement Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is conceded that defendants operate the business by the most modern and up-to-date methods, including the use of modern chemicals to prevent odors, and that there is no negligence.”
• “It is undisputed that there is no place in [the surrounding] counties where such feed lots could be located where they would not be subject to the same objection by people residing in similar areas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).