Garland Community Hospital v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hospital’s conduct in credentialing a physician is “inextricably intertwined with the patient’s medical treatment and the hospital’s provision of health care”
• holding that a claim that hospital negligently credentialed a physician required expert testimony because such claim “involves a specialized standard of care”
• holding that a negligent-credentialing claim involves departure from a specialized standard of care and therefore required expert testimony
• holding that claim for negligent credentialing is health care liability claim because it is claim against health care provider for departure from accepted standards of health care and is inseparable from medical services patient received
• holding that claim for negligent credentialing is health care liability claim because it is claim against health care provider for departure from accepted standards of health care and is inseparable from medical services patient received
• explaining that the Court is not bound by the manner in which the plaintiffs pleadings characterize the claim in determining whether the claim is an HCLC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).