Garland Co. Inc. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no indication that Congress intended the Lanham Act to cover “every isolated alleged misrepresentation made to a potential customer by a business competitor.”
• “[T]his court has found no indication that Congress, through its use of the language ‘commercial advertising or promotion,’ intended to extend Lan-ham Act coverage to every isolated alleged misrepresentation made to a potential customer by a business competitor.”
• relying on Webster’s Third New International Dictionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).