Gargiulo v. Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Board has no authority to consider whether an agency has reasonable grounds for revoking an employee’s security clearance
• finding that, because an employee does not have a property interest in a security 13 clearance, its revocation does not implicate due process
• finding that, because an employee does not have a property interest in a security 13 clearance, its revocation does not implicate due process
• finding that, because an employee does not have a property interest in a security clearance, its revocation does not implicate due process
• finding that, because an employee does not have a property interest in a security 13 clearance, its revocation does not implicate due process
• acknowledging that the petitioner, a FAM who was indefinitely suspended under the TSA personnel management system based on the suspension of his security clearance, had due process rights regarding his indefinite suspension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).