Skip to main content
· 5/16/1978

Garfinkle v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 578 P.2d 945
  • 21 Cal. 3d 268
  • 146 Cal. Rptr. 208
  • 1978 Cal. LEXIS 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “California’s nonjudicial 19 foreclosure procedure does not constitute state action and is therefore immune from the procedural due 20 process requirements of the federal Constitution
  • “California’s nonjudicial foreclosure procedure does not constitute state action and is therefore immune from the procedural due process requirements of the federal Constitution.”
  • “[NJonjudicial foreclosure of a deed of trust constitutes private action authorized by contract and does not come within the scope of the California due process clause.”
  • deed of trust foreclosure sale lacked state action
  • former art. I, § 13

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manuel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.