Garfield Hts. v. Smith

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 2164

Syllabus

Aggravated menacing R.C. 2903.21(A) sufficiency manifest weight admissibility evidence Evid.R. 401 Evid.R. 403(A) Evid.R. 701 victim impact abuse of discretion prejudice. Judgment affirmed. The court properly denied Smith's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal because his aggravated menacing conviction was supported by sufficient evidence. Furthermore, his conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Finally, the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the victim's testimony about obtaining protection order, her son's belief that Smith was going to shoot his mom, and her other son's testimony that the incident impacted him and he wished it never happened.