· 5/5/1992
Garet H. Danvers, on His Own Behalf, and on Behalf of Patrick H. Danvers v. Kathy Higgins Danvers
Citations
- 959 F.2d 601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a party should not receive full attorneys’ fees when attorney proceeded with discovery instead of filing a motion to dismiss meritless claims
- stating that the two goals of deterrence and compensation must be “balanced”
- affirming Rule 11 sanctions where the district court found that the plaintiff filed the action against his ex-wife to harass her and increase her litigation costs unnecessarily where “even cursory research would have revealed that his cause lacked merit”
- “because deterrence is the primary goal, the minimum necessary to deter the sanctioned party is the proper award, even if this amount does not fully compensate the moving party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Nelson, Joiner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.