· 10/15/1834
Gardner v. Webber
Citations
- 33 Mass. 251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an emotional harm is an \injury to person\ or \bodily injury\
- hold- ing that a wife’s loss of consortium claim stemming from her husband’s physical injuries was considered an injury to the wife’s person that was protected under the remedy clause of the Oregon Constitution
- discussing how Horton changed the law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.