Skip to main content
· 12/10/1888

Gardner v. Tatum

Citations

  • 77 Cal. 458
  • 19 P. 879
  • 1888 Cal. LEXIS 725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jeopardy did not attach where the defendant was tried for a criminal offense in a probate court lacking criminal jurisdiction
  • addressing a procedural double jeopardy issue in a pretrial appeal plea of guilty to two counts of a multiple-count indictment did not prevent the state from prosecuting the remaining counts, as all counts “were embraced within a single prosecution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hayne, Works

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.