Gardner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s claim was not ripe for adjudication because his release from prison was not imminent and the Department of Correction had not notified him that he is or will be required to register as a violent offender
• finding that an ex post facto challenge to application of the violent offender registry was not ripe for review while the petitioner was still incarcerated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kirby v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2018-04-27· cited 8×
• William R. Dixon v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-06-16· cited 2×
• Douglas Kirby v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2018-04-27
• Cleverly Lockhart v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-12-04
• Stephen W. Peele v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wallace v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 186×
• Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-01· cited 71×
• Jensen v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 70×
• State v. Pollard
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-06-30· cited 61×