Skip to main content

Gardner v. State

Citations

  • 699 So. 2d 798
  • 1997 WL 587084

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that double jeopardy clause and rule governing motions to correct sentence were not violated when the trial court held a hearing to correct the court’s prior oral pronouncement to reflect a minimum mandatory term
  • reviewing record under earlier version of section 921.001(5) to determine whether sentence which fell within the sentencing guidelines was vindictive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.