Gardner v. Newsome Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that section 56-15-110 “mandates the court to double actual damages as a statutory award to a prevailing plaintiff’
• providing that where there are no South Carolina cases directly on point, the Court may look to the construction placed on the corresponding federal rules of civil procedure
• recognizing, in a case pre-dating the “Closing Fee” Statute, car buyers’ suit seeking recovery under the Dealers Act against car dealer for charging a closing fee met all the class certification requirements of Rule 23
• recognizing, in a case pre-dating the \Closing Fee\ Statute, car buyers' suit seeking recovery under the Dealers Act against car dealer for charging a closing fee met all the class certification requirements of Rule 23
• reversing, in a case pre-dating the enactment of the “Closing Fee” Statute, trial judge’s denial of class certification for car buyers’ suit alleging dealer committed an “unfair act” in charging a closing fee in violation of the Dealers Act
• reversing, in a case pre-dating the enactment of the \Closing Fee\ Statute, trial judge's denial of class certification for car buyers' suit alleging dealer committed an \unfair act\ in charging a closing fee in violation of the Dealers Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).