Gardner v. Mullins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that whether the appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal presents a question of law which we review de novo
• stating that whether the appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal presents a question of law which we review de novo
• noting that appeals under Rule 307(d), like those under Rule 307(a), “must be interlocutory in nature”
• observing that Rule 307 was not a basis for appellate jurisdiction where motion for a temporary restraining order was filed and denied after the circuit court’s final judgment
• noting that the primary objective of statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the legislature, and the most reliable indicator of such intent is the language of the statute given its plain, ordinary, and popularly understood meaning
• noting that the primary objective of statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the legislature, and the most reliable indicator of such intent is the language of the statute given its plain, ordinary, and popularly understood meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).