Skip to main content
· 8/20/2009

Gardner v. City of Cleveland

Citations

  • 656 F. Supp. 2d 751
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73834
  • 2009 WL 2591621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating while ATE ordinance “no doubt raise revenue,” it also “serves to promote safe driving practices”
  • stating while ATE ordinance “no doubt raise revenue,” it also “serves to promote safe driving practices”
  • noting plaintiff submitted no evidence of actual bias or prejudgment
  • noting plaintiff submitted no evidence of actual bias or prejudgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald C. Nugent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.