Gardner v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing Rule 37 discovery sanctions2 where plaintiff failed to respond to discovery requests by due date, to defendant’s letters about the requests, and to a motion for sanctions regarding past-due responses
• rejecting the notion that a plaintiff’s amended complaint, reducing the claimed damages to $74,999.99, deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction, because “[d]iversity jurisdiction is determined as of the date the suit is filed”
• “[T]he plaintiffs amended complaint reducing the damages claimed provides no basis for remanding this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).