Tenth Circuit· 7/17/1996

Gardner Ex Rel. Gardner v. Chrysler Corp.

Citations

89 F.3d 729
35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1037
45 Fed. R. Serv. 332
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17506
1996 WL 399788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

admitting evidence of plaintiff’s failure to use a seatbelt as to the issue of crashworthiness, despite Kansas statute prohibiting evidence of non-use to show comparative negligence or mitigation of damages
hold- ing that a Kansas statute prohibiting admission of seatbelt evidence \for the purpose of determining any aspect of comparative negligence or mitigation of damages\ was substantive and governed in federal court
“If a party is disadvantaged or dissatisfied with discovery [requests], it is the party’s responsibility to particularize the basis of the [objection] so that the court can properly evaluate the arguments and exercise its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Porfilio, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.