Gardner Ex Rel. Gardner v. Chrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting evidence of plaintiff’s failure to use a seatbelt as to the issue of crashworthiness, despite Kansas statute prohibiting evidence of non-use to show comparative negligence or mitigation of damages
• hold- ing that a Kansas statute prohibiting admission of seatbelt evidence \for the purpose of determining any aspect of comparative negligence or mitigation of damages\ was substantive and governed in federal court
• “If a party is disadvantaged or dissatisfied with discovery [requests], it is the party’s responsibility to particularize the basis of the [objection] so that the court can properly evaluate the arguments and exercise its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).