Gardiner v. John W. Bunn & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion when it struck an amended complaint filed in 4 violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)
• finding that district court did not abuse its discretion when it struck an amended complaint that was filed in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)
• “[The plaintiff] is estopped by his nolo contendere plea from now alleging that the police officers lacked probable cause to stop him and arrest him.”
• nolo contendere under Ohio law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).