Gardin v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Board’s “credibility determination is a question of fact beyond this court’s jurisdiction”
• upholding Board finding that vague and inconsistent lay statements were not credible because they were in direct contradiction to the more credible, competent, reliable, and clearly documented medical evidence
• upholding Board finding that vague and inconsistent lay statements were not credible because they were in direct contradiction to the more credible, competent, reliable, and clearly documented medical evidence
• upholding Board finding that vague and inconsistent lay statements were not credible because they were in direct contradiction to the more credible, competent, reliable, and clearly documented medical evidence
• “Whether the Veterans Court was correct in affirming the Board’s credibility determina- tion is a question of fact beyond this court’s jurisdiction.”
• the Board acted appropriately in its fact-finding role in its determination that lay statements of record were not credible because they are “in direct contradiction” to other evidence of record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).