Federal Circuit· 7/16/2010

Gardin v. Shinseki

Citations

613 F.3d 1374
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14670
2010 WL 2898320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the Board’s “credibility determination is a question of fact beyond this court’s jurisdiction”
upholding Board finding that vague and inconsistent lay statements were not credible because they were in direct contradiction to the more credible, competent, reliable, and clearly documented medical evidence
upholding Board finding that vague and inconsistent lay statements were not credible because they were in direct contradiction to the more credible, competent, reliable, and clearly documented medical evidence
upholding Board finding that vague and inconsistent lay statements were not credible because they were in direct contradiction to the more credible, competent, reliable, and clearly documented medical evidence
“Whether the Veterans Court was correct in affirming the Board’s credibility determina- tion is a question of fact beyond this court’s jurisdiction.”
the Board acted appropriately in its fact-finding role in its determination that lay statements of record were not credible because they are “in direct contradiction” to other evidence of record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Gajarsa, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.