GARDEN STATE FIRE, ETC. v. Commercial Union Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a carrier providing excess liability coverage without provision for paying \first-party PIP benefits\ was not liable to the injured person's \primary carrier\ who paid PIP benefits
• \... PIP coverage is first-party coverage. The intent of the No-Fault Law is that each automobile insurer should pay the medical expenses of its insured. It is the primary coverage.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).