Gard v. United States Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting 16 that the CSRA “does not, contrary to the defendant’s suggestion, necessarily preempt Privacy Act claims simply because the facts underlying those claims concern, in part, prohibited personnel practices”
• noting, at summary judgment, that a plaintiff’s “claims must fail to the extent that he has not produced any evidence supporting a reasonable inference that a Privacy Act violation itself actually caused the adverse events of which 21 he complains”
• granting summary judgment for defendant where plaintiff failed to present evidence “to suggest how an interview with him would have altered the substance of his records in any way that would have averted the agency’s decision to place him on administrative leave”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).