Garcia v. Wash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction was proper even where the party, rather than the party’s attorney, was named on the notice of appeal, because it was clear that the attorney sufficiently evidenced his intent to appeal
• stating that a notice of appeal clearly indicated that a sanctioned lawyer intended to appeal where the attorney filed the notice of appeal challenging the sanctions against the attorney
• finding jurisdiction where a notice of appeal specifically referred to the district court’s “refusal to stay the execution of the $60,000 sanction against [the Garcias’] attorney”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).