Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Garcia v. Mexico

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 969
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 826
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3407
  • 571 U.S. 1152
  • 2014 WL 102925
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying three-factor standard to determine whether retaliation for whistleblow-ing amounts to persecution on account of a political opinion
  • discussing three-factor test set forth by Matter of N-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 526, 532-33 (BIA 2011) for determining whether retaliation for whistleblowing constitutes persecution on account of political opinion
  • “Where persecution did not occur on account of a protected ground . . . claims for . . . withholding of removal necessarily fail.”
  • “Where persecution did not occur on account of a protected ground, … claims for … withholding of removal necessarily fail.”
  • “The petitioner has the burden to prove that a nexus exists between the persecution and a protected ground.”
  • “The petitioner has the burden to prove that a nexus exists between the persecution and a protected ground.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.