Garcia v. Marichalar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even for cases involving res ipsa loquitur , an expert report is needed on the issue of causation
• concluding defendant doctor’s conduct was not implicated when expert report did not discuss how his care failed to meet standard of care and how his failure to meet standard of care caused the plaintiff to suffer injury, harm, or damages
• \Section 74.351(r)(6) requires that an expert report explain how the care rendered by the physician failed to meet the applicable standard of care and the causal relationship between that failure and the injury suffered by the claimant.\
• “Section 74.351(r)(6) requires that an expert report explain how the care rendered by the physician failed to meet the applicable standard of care and the causal relationship between that failure and the injury suffered by the claimant.”
• \Section 74.351(r)(6) requires that an expert report explain how the care rendered by the physician failed to meet the applicable standard of care and the causal relationship between that failure and the injury suffered by the claimant.\
• “Section 74.351(r)(6) requires that an expert report explain how the care rendered by the physician failed to meet the applicable standard of care and the causal relationship between that failure and the injury suffered by the claimant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).