Garcia v. Henry Street Settlement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining how the Second Circuit “recognized that this burden has substance” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• explaining how the Second Circuit “recognized that this burden has substance” (quotation marks omitted)
• explaining how the Second Circuit “recognized that this burden has substance” (quotation marks omitted)
• “Speculation, conjecture[,] and guess-work cannot substitute for actual evidence of discrimination.”
• “Speculation, conjecture[,] and guess-work cannot substitute for actual evidence of discrimination.”
• “Speculation, conjecture[,] and guess-work cannot substitute for actual evidence of discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).