Garcia v. Coe Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• continuity of officers, directors, or shareholders is most important factor, followed by adequacy of consideration for the sale and continued existence of seller corp.
• adopting the product line exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-11-21· cited 84×
• Mettinger v. Globe Slicing MacH. Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-05-14· cited 48×
• Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-04· cited 33×
• Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2009-05-05· cited 17×
• Hart v. Bruno Machinery Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-11-05· cited 15×
• Simmons v. Mark Lift Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-10-24· cited 13×
• Lopez v. Delta Int'l Mach. Corp.
  D. New Mexico· 2018-03-15· cited 13×
• Roper Electric Co. v. Quality Castings, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-11-30· cited 12×
• Guerrero v. Allison Engine Co.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-22· cited 9×
• High Desert Recovery v. N.M. Tax'n & Revenue Dep't
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 6×
• King v. Estate of Gilbreath
  D. New Mexico· 2016-03-30
• Burnley, D. v. Loews Hotel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-05

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ray v. Alad Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 396×
• Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1983-06-14· cited 271×
• Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-08-26· cited 264×
• Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-06-18· cited 250×
• Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
  Seventh Circuit· 1977-10-18· cited 150×
• Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1977-12-21· cited 135×
• Stang v. Hertz Corporation
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1972-05-26· cited 112×
• Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.
  First Circuit· 1974-07-18· cited 89×
• Guzman v. MRM/ELGIN WILLCOX & GIBBS, INC.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-03-14· cited 58×
• Nguyen v. Johnson MacHine & Press Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-18· cited 52×
• McCarthy v. Litton Industries, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-07· cited 50×
• Brooks v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-06-28· cited 47×
• Downtowner, Inc. v. Acrometal Products, Inc.
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 45×
• Jones v. JOHNSON MACH. & PRESS CO., ETC.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1982-06-04· cited 36×
• Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. Bank
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-11-21· cited 26×
• Southwest Distributing Co. v. Olympia Brewing Co.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 24×
• Johnston v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-04-09· cited 18×
• Pancratz v. Monsanto Co.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-04-17· cited 16×
• Serna v. Roche Laboratories, Division of Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-07-17· cited 13×