· 11/13/2000
Garcia v. City of Albuquerque
Citations
- 232 F.3d 760
- 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 6240
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 28651
- 2000 WL 1693718
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court’s “terse” order, containing only one sentence for each claim, was still “insufficient to demonstrate that the court failed to review the magistrate’s recommendation de novo”
- holding that a district court’s “terse” order, containing only one sentence for each claim, was still “insufficient to demonstrate that the court failed to review the magistrate’s recommendation de novo”
- holding that a district court’s “terse” order, containing only one sentence for each claim, was still “insufficient to demonstrate that the court failed to review the magistrate’s recommendation de novo”
- holding that ‘a district court’s “terse” order, containing only one sentence for each claim, was still “insufficient to demonstrate that the court failed to review the magistrate’s recommendation de novo’
- holding that a district court’s “terse” order, containing only one sentence for each claim, was still “insufficient to demonstrate that the court failed to review the magistrate’s recommendation de novo”
- holding that a district court’s “terse” order, containing only one sentence for each claim, was still “insufficient to demonstrate that the court failed to review the magistrate’s recommendation de novo”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Holloway, Briscoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.