Garcia v. Andrews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding corporate manager’s three acts which could be construed as sexual harassment insufficient as a matter of law to support claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress even though acts occurred near time of discharge
• conduct of employer who mentally undressed plaintiff with his eyes, asked her if she did her best work in the dark, and talked about the size of men's genitalia was not extreme and outrageous
• conduct of employer who mentally undressed plaintiff with his eyes, asked her if she did her best work in the dark, and talked about the size of men’s genitaha was not extreme and outrageous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).