Garcia Sarmiento v. Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding it was improper for trial court to exclude witness’ prior inconsistent statement for impeachment purposes
• prior statement inconsistent if it ‘‘fails to mention a material fact presently testified to that it should have been natu- ral to mention in the prior statement’’ [internal quota- tion marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).