· 9/26/2016
Garcia, John Eric
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(8), which prohibits exposure of debtor’s account number in glassine window of envelope, confers standing absent additional harm because such exposure is akin to an invasion of privacy
- “[A plaintiff] cannot cross the finish line for an FDCPA claim unless ‘the subject of the transaction [is] primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.’”
- “St. Pierre would have no obligation to pay highway tolls had he chosen to use alternative routes or to keep his car parked rather than drive on the [New Jersey Turnpike] Authority’s roads; the homeowners in Pollice and the residents in Staub had no such choice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.