Garcia Cotto, Carmelo v. Suarez Delgado, Eddie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that liquidation would cause irreparable harm because it would render court powerless to grant an effective remedy
• holding that liquidation of entries during the pendency of' litigation challenging an administrative review negates a plaintiffs right to meaningful judicial review and, thus, constitutes per se irreparable harm
• holding that liquidation of entries during the pendancy of litigation challenging an administrative review negates a plaintiffs right to meaningful judicial review and, thus, constitutes per se irreparable harm
• noting that “evidence of specific competitive injury to Zenith would establish a more compelling showing of irreparable injury warranting injunctive relief”
• noting that liquidation would prevent the trial court from assessing duties on the covered entries “in accordance with a correct margin”
• stating that the antidumping statutory scheme “has no provision permitting reliquidation . . . or imposition of [a different antidumping duty rate] after liquidation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).