Skip to main content
· 3/21/2001

Garcetti v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214
  • 85 Cal. App. 4th 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • same argument was made in support of polygraph examinations
  • use of PCL-R, RRASOR and Static 99 upheld
  • same argument was made in support of polygraph examinations
  • upholding use of PCL-R, RRASOR and Static 99
  • use of PCL-R, RRASOR and Static 99 upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.