Skip to main content
· 7/23/1991

Garabedian v. Skochko

Citations

  • 232 Cal. App. 3d 836
  • 283 Cal. Rptr. 802
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 8990
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5822
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he object of the ‘several remedies’ rule is to excuse the plaintiff from the burden of pursuing duplicate and possibly unnecessary procedures in order to enforce the same rights or obtain the same relief’
  • “As a general rule, absent some wrongdoing on the part of a defendant, a plaintiffs ignorance of his cause of action ... does not prevent the running of the limitations period.”
  • suit against United States Department of 19 Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under Federal Tort Claims Act did not equitably toll 20 suit of plaintiff who was injured on HUD property against an independent contractor who 21 managed property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone (w.A.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.