Gara v. Woodbridge Tavern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary disposition was appropriate because the plaintiff had “offered no evidence that the discovery sought could have established that a dispute did indeed exist”
• “The language whereby the participant agreed to assume ‘any risks inherent in any other activities connected with this event in which I may voluntarily participate’ and to take responsibility for ‘any and all injuries (including death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).