Gantzer v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that uncorroborated testimony of a government informant is sufficient for conviction if the testimony \is not incredible or insubstantial on its face\
• \Purchasing large items with drug money through third parties surely supports an inference of intent to conceal.\
• finding nothing objectionable with statements that \appear reasonably supported by the record or are within the prerogative of the prosecution to characterize the evidence presented at trial and argue certain inferences to the jury\
• no buyer-seller instruction warranted where \overwhelming evidence showed that [co-defendants] agreed to import drugs with the intent to distribute them\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).