Gantt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accusation for driving under the influence of drugs sufficient although it failed to name the specific controlled substance
• because the defendant was in the best position to know what type of drug she had ingested, she could not show that she was misled by the State’s failure to name a specific drug in accusation charging her with driving under the influence of drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the INTEREST OF R. D. Et Al., Children.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-06-13· cited 27×
• Page v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-04· cited 13×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-11-08· cited 12×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-02-10· cited 2×
• Richardson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-24· cited 1×
• Mills v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-12-27· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Broski v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-06-06· cited 28×
• Blackford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-08-22· cited 16×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-11-04· cited 13×
• Wade v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-02· cited 11×
• Stinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-05-30· cited 6×
• State v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-11-25· cited 2×