Skip to main content
· 2/16/1996

Ganther v. Ingle

Citations

  • 75 F.3d 207
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2397
  • 1996 WL 39486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “party is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right, even where the defendant is technically in default.”
  • “[S]cheduling is a matter which is generally left to the discretion of the district court.”
  • “A party is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right . . . .”
  • “The district court should have con- strued Ganther’s response to the motion for summary judgment as a motion to amend his complaint.”
  • “Federal claims against state employees in their official capacities are the equivalent of suits against the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Davis, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.