· 2/16/1996
Ganther v. Ingle
Citations
- 75 F.3d 207
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2397
- 1996 WL 39486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a “party is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right, even where the defendant is technically in default.”
- “[S]cheduling is a matter which is generally left to the discretion of the district court.”
- “A party is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right . . . .”
- “The district court should have con- strued Ganther’s response to the motion for summary judgment as a motion to amend his complaint.”
- “Federal claims against state employees in their official capacities are the equivalent of suits against the state.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wisdom, Davis, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.