Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/17/2002
Gant v. L.U. Transport, Inc.
Citations
- 770 N.E.2d 1155
- 331 Ill. App. 3d 924
- 264 Ill. Dec. 459
- 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where employer acknowledges respondeat superior liability for the conduct of its employee, direct negligence claims become duplicative
- holding that although negligent hiring, retention, or entrustment “may establish independent fault on the part of the employer, it should not impose additional liability on the employer” if respondeat superior applies
- holding Neff remains valid after adoption of comparative negligence doctrine
- “[O]nce an employer admits responsibility under respondeat superior, a plaintiff may not proceed against the employer on a theory of negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent entrustment.”
- “The employer's liability under negligent entrustment, because it is predicated initially on, and therefore is entirely derivative of, the negligence of the employee, cannot exceed the liability of the employee.”
- predicting Nevada courts would follow majority rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Diaz v. CarcamoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 64×
- Ferrer v. OkbamicaelSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-02-27· cited 40×
- QUYNN v. HULSEYSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-11-02· cited 28×
- McQueen v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court· 2022-04-21· cited 23×
- Bogdanski v. BudzikWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-01-24· cited 21×
- Southard v. BelangerW.D. Kentucky· 2013-08-19· cited 15×
- Ramon v. Nebo School DistrictUtah Supreme Court· 2021-07-15· cited 10×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-08-19· cited 9×
- Love v. City of Chi.E.D. Illinois· 2019-01-28· cited 7×
- Thompson v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-08-18· cited 5×
- Finkle v. Regency CSP Ventures Ltd. PartnershipD. South Dakota· 2014-06-18· cited 5×
- McQueen v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-10-19· cited 3×
- McQueen v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-10-16· cited 3×
- Cole v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois· 2025-03-14· cited 1×
- Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Shiraz A. Ali v. Jennifer Blake, Individually and as Next Friend for Nathan Blake, and as Heir of the Estate of Zachery Blake, And Eldridge Moak, in His Capacity as Guardian of the Estate of Briana BlakeTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2021-07-27
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 738×
- Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-04· cited 400×
- Van Horne v. MullerIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 178×
- McHaffie Ex Rel. McHaffie v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-01-24· cited 154×
- Viirre v. Zayre Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-04-25· cited 34×
- Lockett v. Bi-State Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 29×
- Neff v. Davenport Packing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-02-26· cited 23×
- Ledesma v. Cannonball, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-04-24· cited 20×
- Montgomery v. Petty Management Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-06-22· cited 16×
- Sloma v. Arens Controls, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-10-12· cited 2×
Other cases named Gant v. L.U. Transport, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.