Gant v. C.F. Motorfreight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no evidence that Simmons was terminated for opposing an ADA violation or participating in an ADA-related investigation or proceeding. Therefore, Simmons failed to create an issue of material fact as to her ADA retaliation claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).