Ganrud v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an expert need not be a physician to give opinion testimony on the probability of loss of memory following head injury and a long period of unconsciousness
• holding that an expert — in this ease a physiologist — need not be a physician to give opinion testimony on the probability of loss of memory following head injury and a long period of unconsciousness
• lay opinion evidence inadmissible unless it will aid the jury in determining outcome and is based on special training, experience, or knowledge of witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).