Gannett Outdoor Co. v. City of Atlantic City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that trial court granted motion to suppress results of a breath test on the basis that the test was unlawfully performed in the absence of Miranda warnings and noting that State appealed under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4)
• remanding case for the trial court to consider defendant’s argument that his breath test results should be suppressed because the implied consent advisement provided to him was misleading, 5 implicating the decision in Elliott
• implied warranty of workmanlike quality in the contract of sale survives the passing of the deed or the taking of possession by the initial vendee
• the Georgia Constitution does not require a Miranda warning before a suspect in custody is asked to submit to a breath test
• “We equated [former OCGA § 24-9-20] with Paragraph XVI without further analysis of the constitutional provision (which does not appear to have been raised by the appellant in that case) . . . .”
• “An express due process provision first entered the Georgia Constitution in 1861,” was amended slightly in 1865 to protect “persons” instead of “citizens,” and “[a] substantially identical version of this provision has been readopted in every Georgia Constitution since.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).