Gangl v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing judgment against an employer because it was inconsistent with the jury’s verdict exonerating the named employee
• a judgment holding an agent or servant not negligent “compels a similar finding, as matter of law, for the principal or master”
• “A finding that the agent or servant is not negligent compels a similar finding, as a matter of law, for the [defaulting] principal or master.”
• “We are aware of only one instance in which our law countenances the entry of inconsistent judgments in the same case, that being in practice under G.L.c. 93A”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).